Logical, rational, and sane people already know that Fox News is the media talking head, and lie spreading feux news channel, for people who are controlled by fear, promote hate, and are in a perpetual state of playing follow the leader (aka Conservative Christian Republicans). One of the things they’re very good at is relentlessly promoting their narrow-minded message, in spite of differing, more reasonable opinions. However, I admire their ability to be so blazen in their bias – it’s definitely a sight to see, even if just to witness the pure destructive spectacle of it.
One of the best things Fox News is good at is spinning a poll. Not only can they throw around poll numbers that are completely different from other news organizations–numbers that are always in favor of their message–they can also craft a damn good biased poll. They recently did a poll called Does the ‘Reconciliation’ Gambit Make You Angry?.
The three options they included (there were actually four, but the “Other” option is just there to filter out trolls) would have been fine if they were expressed without their tacked on opinions. In its simple form–without opinions–it was Yes, Not Sure, and No. Simple enough. However, the opinions that came after each option were cynical, biased, and designed to fuel the moronic angst of the type of people who actually go to Fox News to get their news.
- Yes. This is outrageous! They’re using rules to bypass the clear voice of the people – payback in November, guys.
- Not sure, but if they have to resort to rules loopholes to pass a law, doesn’t that indicate that a lot of people oppose it?
- No. Look, we need health care reform and we need it now. Let’s get started, even if it means using a rules loophole.
The “Not Sure” and “No” options were sabotaged with dickishness.
“…doesn’t that indicate that a lot of people oppose it?”
“Let’s get started, even if it means using a rules loophole.”
I mean, really? Not surprisingly, most people chose yes 
If you preach to a choir, can a tree in a forest hear the preaching?
