<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Freethinker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fthink.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fthink.org</link>
	<description>Religion is the survivalism of higher reasoning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:26:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Remembering what the Bible actually is</title>
		<link>http://fthink.org/remembering-what-the-bible-actually-is/</link>
		<comments>http://fthink.org/remembering-what-the-bible-actually-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fthink.org/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Being Human blog just rewrote a secular sermon that was written in late 2009. The message is a reminder of the true context of the Bible – a collection of contemporary literature. I love the juxtaposition of the Bible with other religious texts, and how the acceptance of a work&#8217;s mysticism is directly related [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://beinghuman.blogs.fi/">Being Human</a> blog just rewrote a secular sermon that was written in late 2009. The message is a reminder of the <a href="http://beinghuman.blogs.fi/2009/12/18/is-the-bible-just-a-collection-of-then-contemporary-literature-7603850/">true context of the Bible</a> – a collection of contemporary literature. I love the juxtaposition of the Bible with other religious texts, and how the acceptance of a work&#8217;s mysticism is directly related to an individual&#8217;s choice of religious exclusivity.</p>
<blockquote><p>Most Christians do reject most of the holy books of other religion as a bunch of ancient fairy tales. One could ask for a good reason why would do one treat the holy book of one religion differently?</p>
<p>The simple answer is that accepting just a certain religion can make one think that the old book of that religion is something special. Still, the very same people so very often end up thinking that the holy books of any other religions are just work of humans.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fthink.org/remembering-what-the-bible-actually-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is the real God?</title>
		<link>http://fthink.org/who-is-the-real-god/</link>
		<comments>http://fthink.org/who-is-the-real-god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fthink.org/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a couple of strange things about this video, but the logic is interesting. I particularly like the conclusion of &#8220;who is god?&#8221;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a couple of strange things about this video, but the logic is interesting. I particularly like the conclusion of &#8220;who is god?&#8221;. </p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-j8ZMMuu7MU" frameborder="0" allowFullScreen="true"> </iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fthink.org/who-is-the-real-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The problem with the world is that&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://fthink.org/the-problem-with-the-world-is-that/</link>
		<comments>http://fthink.org/the-problem-with-the-world-is-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fthink.org/?p=536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.fthink.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/random.jpeg" alt="The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts, while the stupid ones are full of confidence." title="The problem with the world" width="700" height="448" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-537" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fthink.org/the-problem-with-the-world-is-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Putting faith in its place</title>
		<link>http://fthink.org/putting-faith-in-its-place/</link>
		<comments>http://fthink.org/putting-faith-in-its-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fthink.org/?p=534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a lot of logic smashed into 10 minutes. Hold on and listen well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of logic smashed into 10 minutes. Hold on and listen well.</p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5wV_REEdvxo" frameborder="0" allowFullScreen="true"> </iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fthink.org/putting-faith-in-its-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The budget explained in simple English</title>
		<link>http://fthink.org/the-budget-explained-in-simple-english/</link>
		<comments>http://fthink.org/the-budget-explained-in-simple-english/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fthink.org/?p=529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(I&#8217;m not sure who the original author is. Found this being shared on Facebook) I love it when complex things are simplified so that we can all understand. United States Tax revenue: $2,170,000,000,000 Fed budget: $3,820,000,000,000 New debt: $1,650,000,000,000 National debt: $14,271,000,000,000 Recent budget cut: $38,500,000,000 Now, remove 8 zeros and pretend it&#8217;s a household [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>(I&#8217;m not sure who the original author is. Found this being shared on Facebook)</em></p>
<p>I love it when complex things are simplified so that we can all understand.</p>
<ul>
<li>United States Tax revenue: $2,170,000,000,000</li>
<li>Fed budget: $3,820,000,000,000</li>
<li>New debt: $1,650,000,000,000</li>
<li>National debt: $14,271,000,000,000</li>
<li>Recent budget cut: $38,500,000,000</li>
</ul>
<p>Now, remove 8 zeros and pretend it&#8217;s a household budget.</p>
<ul>
<li>Annual family income: $21,700</li>
<li>Money the family spent: $38,200</li>
<li>New debt on the credit card: $16,500</li>
<li>Outstanding balance on credit card: $142,710</li>
<li>Total budget cuts which some politicians are proud about: $385</li>
</ul>
<p>Stop the insanity now. Vote them out and demand a balanced budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fthink.org/the-budget-explained-in-simple-english/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religions&#8217; number one enemy: Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://fthink.org/religions-enemy-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://fthink.org/religions-enemy-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 01:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fthink.org/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since my wife and I became freethinkers – we were formerly evangelical Christians – we&#8217;ve had many discussions about the culture our children are growing up in. We are Southerners, and we live in a neighborhood that is predominantly protestant. Almost everyone we come into contact with goes to church, and their kids are active [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since my wife and I became freethinkers – we were formerly evangelical Christians – we&#8217;ve had many discussions about the culture our children are growing up in. We are Southerners, and we live in a neighborhood that is predominantly protestant. Almost everyone we come into contact with goes to church, and their kids are active in church related activities. While this concerns my wife, it doesn&#8217;t concern me. The main reason is because of the Internet.</p>
<p>Since the mainstream adoption of the Internet, I&#8217;ve been predicting that it would forever change religion – especially for teenagers and young adults. The main reason for this is access to knowledge.</p>
<p>My wife and I grew up protected from dissenting views of our faith. We were lied to (or not told enough information) about the origin of the Bible and the true history surrounding our religion, let alone all religions. Our parents and our churches used an age-old method used by all religions, which was to relentlessly educate us from a young age with a myopic world view – one that was severely sanitized.</p>
<p>That approach still happens today, but something now changes when those kids become teenagers. They gain uncensored access to the Internet.</p>
<p>My prediction has been that access to knowledge on the Internet will forever change the religious landscape in the <abbr title="United States">US</abbr>. Unlike when I was a teenager, there are now numerous resources like the <a href="http://new.exchristian.net/">ExChristian.net</a> and <a href="http://www.thinkatheist.com/">Think Atheist</a> communities, books like <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0060859512/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=familyresourceco&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369&#038;creativeASIN=0060859512">Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why</a> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0618918248/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=familyresourceco&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369&#038;creativeASIN=0618918248">The God Delusion</a>, and movies like <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001MFNB5I/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=familyresourceco&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399373&#038;creativeASIN=B001MFNB5I">Religulous</a>.</p>
<p>Based on <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/09/teens-leave-churches-seen-as-judgmental-unfriendly_n_1001528.html">new research by the Barna Group</a>, my prediction (a prediction that is <em>not</em> unique to me) may be coming true.</p>
<blockquote><p>Researchers found that almost three out of five young Christians (59 percent) leave church life either permanently or for an extended period of time after age 15.</p></blockquote>
<p>While it may take another decade to see real change in our traditionally superstitious society, I believe the demise of <em>make believe</em> in American society is now only a matter of time. This not only gives me hope for society, it also gives me hope for my children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fthink.org/religions-enemy-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unfortunate Religious Connotations</title>
		<link>http://fthink.org/unfortunate-religious-connotations/</link>
		<comments>http://fthink.org/unfortunate-religious-connotations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fthink.org/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was listening to a new band called Sleeping Bag on Rdio. They had a song that had some religious references in it. In particular: I&#8217;m not that kind of ChristianNo I&#8217;m not that kind of a LutherenIt&#8217;s not that type of a question.I&#8217;m not that kind of a Christian. That made me curious, so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was listening to a new band called <a href="http://sleepingbag.bandcamp.com/">Sleeping Bag</a> on <a href="http://www.rdio.com/">Rdio</a>. They had a song that had some religious references in it. In particular:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m not that kind of Christian<br/>No I&#8217;m not that kind of a Lutheren<br/>It&#8217;s not that type of a question.<br/>I&#8217;m not that kind of a Christian.</p></blockquote>
<p>That made me curious, so I looked at their label. It was curiously called <a href="http://www.joyfulnoiserecordings.com/">Joyful Noise Recordings</a>. I thought, surely they must be a Christian label – something similar to <a href="http://www.toothandnail.com/">Tooth and Nail</a>. After looking around their site, it seemed if they were a Christian label, they were doing a good job of hiding it.</p>
<p>I finally stumbled upon a link on their About page that enlightened me to their stance on religion. It was a link to <a href="http://unfortunatereligiousconnotations.com/">Unfortunate Religious Connotations</a>. It was a very simple WordPress site with only one blog entry. The entry, &#8220;On the name Joyful Noise&#8221;, explained the label&#8217;s position on its name and their relationship to religion/faith. The entry was very respectful and thoughtful, and concluded that they were in no way religious, but certainly wouldn&#8217;t be against taking on a religious group.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://unfortunatereligiousconnotations.com/2010/10/24/on-the-name-joyful-noise/"><p>I would not shy away from working with a religious band, provided that they were artistically honest and aesthetically on par.</p></blockquote>
<p>However, the reality of such a possibility came with this amazing caveat at the end of the entry.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://unfortunatereligiousconnotations.com/2010/10/24/on-the-name-joyful-noise/"><p>We simply strive to be honest with our religious beliefs (which means we are basically agnostic), and we would be happy releasing an inventive Christian group alongside of Montreal’s genital draining fuckfests.</p></blockquote>
<p>While they are certainly taking what I consider to be a high road, there&#8217;s a part of me that entertains the idea of purposefully using religious connotations in the use of organizations and movements that are <em>not</em> religious in nature. Mainly to show that <em>good</em> and <em>morality</em> are not exclusively held by those who are religious. Of course, there&#8217;s also the reality for some that religion is void of <em>good</em> and <em>morality</em>, but that&#8217;s a completely different blog entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fthink.org/unfortunate-religious-connotations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Shermer interview with Mr. Deity</title>
		<link>http://fthink.org/michael-shermer-interview-mr-deity/</link>
		<comments>http://fthink.org/michael-shermer-interview-mr-deity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fthink.org/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Deity interviews Michael Shermer, author of The Believing Brain. The conclusion from Mr. Deity is that he needs to make his creatures more gullible. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTrN2y_ueBU]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Deity interviews Michael Shermer, author of <a href="http://fthink.org/about/believingbrain/">The Believing Brain</a>. The conclusion from Mr. Deity is that he needs to make his creatures more gullible.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTrN2y_ueBU&#038;fmt=18">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTrN2y_ueBU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fthink.org/michael-shermer-interview-mr-deity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Psychologists spreading smartphone FUD</title>
		<link>http://fthink.org/smartphone-fear-uncertainty-death/</link>
		<comments>http://fthink.org/smartphone-fear-uncertainty-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fthink.org/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tennessean recently published an AP article entitled, Smartphone obsessions trouble psychologists (Evernote archive). The psychologists they interviewed are completely full of shit! &#8220;Watching people who get their first smartphone, there&#8217;s a very quick progression from having a basic phone you don&#8217;t talk about to people who love their iPhone, name their phone and buy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tennessean recently published an <abbr title="Associated Press">AP</abbr> article entitled, <a href="http://www.tennessean.com/article/20110730/NEWS/307300023/Smartphone-obsessions-trouble-psychologists">Smartphone obsessions trouble psychologists</a> (<a href="https://www.evernote.com/shard/s3/sh/8f01deb6-6045-45d9-8aeb-b373eadb9af3/0af0bcb35521f3f4240a645dd62bf765">Evernote archive</a>). The psychologists they interviewed are completely full of shit!</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Watching people who get their first smartphone, there&#8217;s a very quick progression from having a basic phone you don&#8217;t talk about to people who love their iPhone, name their phone and buy their phones outfits,&#8221; said Lisa Merlo, director of psychotherapy training at the University of Florida.</p></blockquote>
<p>Anyone going from a RAZR to an iPhone is going to be enamored by it. They&#8217;re moving from a phone where the most they could do beyond calls was text using numbers, to a phone that can now play games and videos, provide a full keyboard for texting and emailing, and can be used as a GPS device in your car. Of course they&#8217;re going to love the phone! As for naming their phone, nobody does that. And if they do, who cares?!</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;psychologists say the love of them is becoming more like an addiction, creating consequences that range from teenagers who communicate in three-letter acronyms like LOL and BRB to car accidents caused by people who text while driving.</p></blockquote>
<p>Using shortened text and acronyms is not an addiction. As for car accidents caused by people who are texting, that has <em>nothing</em> to do with smartphones, and has everything to do with stupidity.</p>
<blockquote><p>Merlo, a clinical psychologist, said she’s observed a number of behaviors among smartphone users that she labels &#8220;problematic.&#8221; Merlo says some patients pretend to talk on the phone or fiddle with apps to avoid eye contact or other interactions at a bar or a party. Others are so engrossed that they ignore people completely.</p></blockquote>
<p>They are using their smartphone, because the information and interactions on the smartphone are far more interesting than the people in the room. Before the smartphone, a person would stare at the TV screen at the bar, needlessly check the time on their watch, stare at their drink, leave, or grin and bear with people who annoy the living shit out of them. When you look at it like that, the smartphone is the greatest device ever made!</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The more bells and whistles the phone has,&#8221; she says, &#8220;the more likely they are to get too attached.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This is where the psychologist, Merlo, really gets it wrong. What is a smartphone really? A smartphone is a replacement for separate, antiquated and immobile devices. It consolidates <em>all</em> of those devices into one tiny, portable device. Some of the things it replaces are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Landline phone</li>
<li>Desktop computer (for email, web browsing and e-commerce)</li>
<li>Calendar</li>
<li>Address Book</li>
<li>Stereo coupled with CDs/Cassettes/Records</li>
<li>Video game system</li>
<li>Wallet</li>
<li>Newspaper and Magazines</li>
<li>Notepad</li>
<li>Camera</li>
<li><abbr title="Global Positioning Satellite">GPS</abbr> devices</li>
<li>Alarm Clock</li>
</ul>
<p>Of course they&#8217;re going to become attached to it, but that&#8217;s because it just replaced 10+ things in their life.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s too bad that the psychologists interviewed in this article are so clueless. The entire piece reeks of self-motivated job security – creating and perpetuating problems that don&#8217;t actually exist for self gain. If you focus on any human behavior without considering the full context and history of its actions, it will almost always be <em>troubling</em>. However, it&#8217;s the job of a counseling psychologist to cut through the bullshit, not create it.</p>
<p>The word &#8220;addiction&#8221; was needlessly and <em>unprofessionally</em> misused in this article. The reality is that everyone has an addiction to something. It may be a concentrated addiction to one thing, or an addiction to many things (which subsequently helps mask it from a clinical perspective). Addiction in itself isn&#8217;t a bad thing. It&#8217;s only bad when it interferes with your ability to relate well to others, harms other people or yourself, causes you to lose your job or not pay your bills, etc&#8230; The person who chooses to pull out their smartphone at a party they don&#8217;t want to be at is not ruining their life with their so called addiction to smartphones. What they&#8217;re doing is making the best out of crappy situation that&#8217;s full of douchebags and blowhards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fthink.org/smartphone-fear-uncertainty-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>50 renowned academics speaking about God</title>
		<link>http://fthink.org/academics-speaking-about-god/</link>
		<comments>http://fthink.org/academics-speaking-about-god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fthink.org/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more scientifically literate, intellectually honest and objectively skeptical a person is, the more likely they are to disbelieve in anything supernatural, including god. All the speakers featured are elite academics and professors at top institutions, many of whom are also Nobel Laureates. A film by Dr Jonathan Pararajasingham]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more scientifically literate, intellectually honest and objectively skeptical a person is, the more likely they are to disbelieve in anything supernatural, including god.</p>
<p>All the speakers featured are elite academics and professors at top institutions, many of whom are also Nobel Laureates.</p>
<p><iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/s47ArcQL-XQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>A film by <a href="http://drjtp.com">Dr Jonathan Pararajasingham</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fthink.org/academics-speaking-about-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 518/611 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.fthink.org

Served from: fthink.org @ 2012-02-05 12:16:14 -->
