New study suggests that analytic thinking leads to disbelief

“If God exists, and if believing in God is perfectly rational, then why does increasing rational thinking tend to decrease belief in God?”

Why indeed? Rationalization may not be the right word for it, because rationalization is exactly what keeps people entrenched in their religious beliefs. However, analyzing is definitely an appropriate word. It is logic that dispels the illogical when void of rationalization.

Read Scientific American’s article Losing Your Religion: Analytic Thinking Can Undermine Belief to learn more about this study.

No Rights: The Life of an Atheist

This is Krystal Myers’ editorial that was blocked from being published in her school’s student newspaper. Krystal is captain of her swim team and an honors student, while her school (students, faculty and administrators) and small town in Tennessee are predominantly Christian.

Krystal Myers

Photo by Adam Brimer, News Sentinel

By Krystal Myers

The point of view expressed in this article does not necessarily reflect the point of view of the Panther Press, its staff, adviser, or school.

As a current student in Government, I have realized that I feel that my rights as an Atheist are severely limited and unjust when compared to other students who are Christians. Not only are there multiple clubs featuring the Christian faith, but youth ministers are also allowed to come onto school campus and hand candy and other food out to Christians and their friends. However, I feel like if an Atheist did that, people would not be happy about it. This may not be true, but due to pervasive negative feelings towards Atheists in the school, I feel that it would be the case. My question is, “Why? Why does Atheism have such a bad reputation?” And an even better question, “Why do Christians have special rights not allowed to non-believers?”

Before I even begin, I just want to clear up some misconceptions about Atheism. No, we do not worship the “devil.” We do not believe in God, so we also do not believe in Satan. And we may be “godless” but that does not mean that we are without morals. I know, personally, I strive to be the best person I can be, even without religion. In fact, I have been a better person since I have rejected religion. And perhaps the most important misconception is that we want to convert everyone into Atheists and that we hate Christians. For the most part, we just want to be respected for who we are and not be judged.

Now you should know exactly what an Atheist is. Dictionary.com says that an Atheist is, “a person who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings.” However, this does not mean that Atheists do not believe in higher causes; we just do not believe in a higher being.

With that being said, I can move on to the real issue. Before I begin, I want you to think about your rights and how your perceived “rights” might be affecting the rights of others.

There are several instances where my rights as a non-believer, and the rights of anyone other than a Christian, have been violated. These instances inspired me to investigate the laws concerning the separation of church and state, and I learned some interesting things. However, first, I would like you to know specifically what my grievances are against the school. First and foremost is the sectarian prayer that occurs at graduation every year. Fortunately, I am not the first one to have thought that this was a problem. In the Supreme Court case, Lee v. Weisman, it was decided that allowing prayer at graduation is a violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment that says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Special speakers can pray, but the school cannot endorse the prayer or plan for it to happen.

Public prayer also occurs at all of the home football games using the public address system. This has, again, been covered by the Supreme Court case Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe. The Court ruled that school-sponsored prayer is an unconstitutional violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. If a speaker prays, it is fine. However, as soon as the school provides sponsorship, it becomes illegal. Sponsorship can be almost anything, even something as simple as saying that the speaker can pray or choosing a speaker with a known propensity to pray or share his or her religious views.

However, it is not just the speakers who we have to fear at Lenoir City High School. We also have to fear some of the teachers and what they might say about their own religious beliefs. On at least two separate occasions, teachers have made their religious preferences known to basically the whole school.

One teacher has made her religious preferences known by wearing t-shirt depicting the crucifix while performing her duties as a public employee. Also, Kristi Brackett, a senior at Lenoir City High School, has said that the teacher, “strongly encouraged us to join [a religious club] and be on the group’s leadership team.” Yet again, this violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. When asked if this was true, the teacher replied, “As a teacher I would never use my power of influence to force my beliefs or the beliefs of [a religious club] on any student in the school.” Regardless, the religious t-shirts are still inappropriate in the school setting. Teachers are prohibited from making their religious preferences known; the Constitution requires them to be neutral when acting in their capacity as a public school teacher.

Not only are religious preferences shown through shirts, but also through a “Quote of the Day” that some teachers write on the boards in their classrooms. One teacher has Bible verses occasionally as the teacher’s “Quote of the Day” for students. The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment has been violated, yet again with no regard for non-believers.

But perhaps I would have more hope in our school and the possibility of change on the horizon if our own school board did not open their meetings with prayer. A person who wished to remain anonymous that has been present at school board meetings says, “They do have prayers. They pray to ‘Our Heavenly Father’ and end with ‘In Jesus’ Name We Pray.’” Not only is this a violation of Supreme Court law, but also a violation of the board’s own policy that prohibits prayer at school-sponsored events. The whole foundation of how our school is conducted is established by obvious Christians. Somehow, this is unsurprising. If our School Board chooses to ignore the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and the Supreme Court, then it is no surprise that teachers choose to do the same.

I know that I will keep trying to gain my rights as an Atheist and as an American citizen, but I also need your help in educating other people to realize the injustice done to all minority groups. The Christian faith cannot rule the United States. It is unconstitutional. Religion and government are supposed to be separate. If we let this slide, what other amendments to the Constitution will be ignored? I leave you to decide what you will or will not do, but just remember that non-believers are not what you originally thought we were; we are human beings just like you.

Questioning the Soul

Excerpt from Annabel’s post, Why I am an atheist.

And one day, I finally caved to my doubts and actually considered a question that had been hanging around at the edge of my consciousness for years. It’s accepted among most Christians that humans are the only human beings to have souls. Dogs, cats, horses, goldfish – nothing. Chimps, nothing. We assume the Australopithecines had no soul. So what about Homo habilis? Or Homo erectus? No. So when had the soul appeared? Which individual was the first Homo sapiens and had the first soul? Of course, I knew that was a ridiculous question. But it had to be asked, because if there was no soul, there could be no afterlife. No heaven, or hell. And if there was no afterlife, there was no god, and it was all an invention of people who were afraid of death, and so convinced themselves that they would live forever.

Remembering what the Bible actually is

The Being Human blog just rewrote a secular sermon that was written in late 2009. The message is a reminder of the true context of the Bible – a collection of contemporary literature. I love the juxtaposition of the Bible with other religious texts, and how the acceptance of a work’s mysticism is directly related to an individual’s choice of religious exclusivity.

Most Christians do reject most of the holy books of other religion as a bunch of ancient fairy tales. One could ask for a good reason why would do one treat the holy book of one religion differently?

The simple answer is that accepting just a certain religion can make one think that the old book of that religion is something special. Still, the very same people so very often end up thinking that the holy books of any other religions are just work of humans.

Who is the real God?

There are a couple of strange things about this video, but the logic is interesting. I particularly like the conclusion of “who is god?”.

The problem with the world is that…

The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts, while the stupid ones are full of confidence.

Putting faith in its place

There’s a lot of logic smashed into 10 minutes. Hold on and listen well.

The budget explained in simple English

(I’m not sure who the original author is. Found this being shared on Facebook)

I love it when complex things are simplified so that we can all understand.

  • United States Tax revenue: $2,170,000,000,000
  • Fed budget: $3,820,000,000,000
  • New debt: $1,650,000,000,000
  • National debt: $14,271,000,000,000
  • Recent budget cut: $38,500,000,000

Now, remove 8 zeros and pretend it’s a household budget.

  • Annual family income: $21,700
  • Money the family spent: $38,200
  • New debt on the credit card: $16,500
  • Outstanding balance on credit card: $142,710
  • Total budget cuts which some politicians are proud about: $385

Stop the insanity now. Vote them out and demand a balanced budget.

Religions’ number one enemy: Knowledge

Since my wife and I became freethinkers – we were formerly evangelical Christians – we’ve had many discussions about the culture our children are growing up in. We are Southerners, and we live in a neighborhood that is predominantly protestant. Almost everyone we come into contact with goes to church, and their kids are active in church related activities. While this concerns my wife, it doesn’t concern me. The main reason is because of the Internet.

Since the mainstream adoption of the Internet, I’ve been predicting that it would forever change religion – especially for teenagers and young adults. The main reason for this is access to knowledge.

My wife and I grew up protected from dissenting views of our faith. We were lied to (or not told enough information) about the origin of the Bible and the true history surrounding our religion, let alone all religions. Our parents and our churches used an age-old method used by all religions, which was to relentlessly educate us from a young age with a myopic world view – one that was severely sanitized.

That approach still happens today, but something now changes when those kids become teenagers. They gain uncensored access to the Internet.

My prediction has been that access to knowledge on the Internet will forever change the religious landscape in the US. Unlike when I was a teenager, there are now numerous resources like the ExChristian.net and Think Atheist communities, books like Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why and The God Delusion, and movies like Religulous.

Based on new research by the Barna Group, my prediction (a prediction that is not unique to me) may be coming true.

Researchers found that almost three out of five young Christians (59 percent) leave church life either permanently or for an extended period of time after age 15.

While it may take another decade to see real change in our traditionally superstitious society, I believe the demise of make believe in American society is now only a matter of time. This not only gives me hope for society, it also gives me hope for my children.

Unfortunate Religious Connotations

I was listening to a new band called Sleeping Bag on Rdio. They had a song that had some religious references in it. In particular:

I’m not that kind of Christian
No I’m not that kind of a Lutheren
It’s not that type of a question.
I’m not that kind of a Christian.

That made me curious, so I looked at their label. It was curiously called Joyful Noise Recordings. I thought, surely they must be a Christian label – something similar to Tooth and Nail. After looking around their site, it seemed if they were a Christian label, they were doing a good job of hiding it.

I finally stumbled upon a link on their About page that enlightened me to their stance on religion. It was a link to Unfortunate Religious Connotations. It was a very simple WordPress site with only one blog entry. The entry, “On the name Joyful Noise”, explained the label’s position on its name and their relationship to religion/faith. The entry was very respectful and thoughtful, and concluded that they were in no way religious, but certainly wouldn’t be against taking on a religious group.

I would not shy away from working with a religious band, provided that they were artistically honest and aesthetically on par.

However, the reality of such a possibility came with this amazing caveat at the end of the entry.

We simply strive to be honest with our religious beliefs (which means we are basically agnostic), and we would be happy releasing an inventive Christian group alongside of Montreal’s genital draining fuckfests.

While they are certainly taking what I consider to be a high road, there’s a part of me that entertains the idea of purposefully using religious connotations in the use of organizations and movements that are not religious in nature. Mainly to show that good and morality are not exclusively held by those who are religious. Of course, there’s also the reality for some that religion is void of good and morality, but that’s a completely different blog entry.